| |
Public Employee Press
Local 375 tells Parks
Contract IN, $ave millions
|  An in-house
design cost $4 million less than a contractors proposal for repair work
along a Brooklyn seawall. Inset, Local 375 1st Vice President Jon Forster and
Structural Engineer Reza Mashayekhi testify at a City Council hearing April 28.
|
By GREGORY N. HEIRES Local 375
has launched a campaign to cut the use of overpaid consultants in the Parks Dept.
and let civil service professionals do better work for less money. A
report the local presented to the City Council April 28 charges that the agency
wastes millions of dollars on outside consultants while its own union Architects,
Landscape Architects, Engineers and Construction Project Managers could save money
and improve the quality of important capital construction projects. Over
the years, Parks has allowed the ranks of its professional and technical staff
to dwindle as it has increased the management fat and relied more on consultants,
Local 375 President Claude Fort said. This misguided policy wastes taxpayers
dollars and squanders the expertise of the departments employees.
Unwise and unproven consultant designs can result in multiple change
orders, which drive up costs dramatically, says the report, which was presented
to the City Council Waterfronts Committee at an April 28 hearing. The
report shows how civil servants have saved the department millions of dollars
by changing consultants recommendations or offering better alternatives.
Local 375 1st Vice President Jon Forster testified at the hearing along with Reza
Mashayekhi, a Structural Engineer at Parks. Too often, management
keeps pouring money into consultants plans, which ultimately end up costing
far more than they should, says the report. Consultant plans often prove
unworkable, leaving city civil service professionals to resolve technical problems
to salvage the project. Forster said Parks Dept. staff has consistently
turned out excellently designed projects, including City Hall Park, Brooklyn Bridge
Park, the Ocean Breeze fishing pier on Staten Island, and the Ederle Amphitheater
in Flushing Meadows Corona Park. Engineering
staff decimated Despite the strong track record of its own employees,
Forster said Parks has decimated its in-house engineering staff over
the past 10 years as the agency has farmed out technical work to consultants at
a much higher cost to taxpayers. He called the policy misguided because
the work of civil servants is often superior and almost always less expensive.
Mashayekhi presented concrete examples of projects where city workers helped save
millions of dollars by suggesting alternate plans to the recommendations of contractors.
- He personally helped the city save $4 million in repair work
along Brooklyns Shore Parkway, where numerous sinkholes had appeared.
A private contractor recommended covering the sinkholes with concrete slabs, but
Mashayekhi showed that the slabs wouldnt prevent further undermining by
the sea below. The department ultimately adopted his plan, which uses layers of
material below the surface to dissipate wave action and prevent further erosion.
- In another case, an in-house alternative plan for reconstructing
a seawall along the Bronx River cost only $300,000 to implement, compared with
a consultants design, which would have cost $1 million.
- But
the Parks Dept. rejected an in-house design modification for rebuilding the East
River Park Promenade within the $55 million budgeted and accepted a consultants
plan, which ended up costing $72 million a waste of $17 million.
In
its report, Local 375 called for Parks to expand its in-house professional and
technical staff, improve promotional opportunities, pursue non-discriminatory
hiring and promotion policies, and assign the most challenging projects to civil
servants rather than to more expensive consultants. The local also urged
the City Council to create an interagency committee to coordinate waterfront policies
and to establish an oversight policy that would let civil servants report wasteful
or badly designed projects without fear of retaliation. | |